Comments on: Mind Boggler just for Chris

By: Chris M

Chris M — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:11:06 +0000

Super, I’ll continue to watch my RSS reader

]]>

By: Kerry

Kerry — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:51:00 +0000

Stay tuned for next weeks installment, it will be a tough one

]]>

By: Chris M

Chris M — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:24:07 +0000

HAHA!

Ye, realised that sequential wasn’t correct, hence the quick change

]]>

By: Kerry

Kerry — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:03:16 +0000

Chris! you are the weakest link and you leave with nothing, Goodbye!

Only joking, your second answer was correct, well done!

]]>

By: Chris M

Chris M — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:23:48 +0000

OK, wait, I went the sequential route, not the balanced route, argh, I am most probably incorrect.

My answer would now be a DIAMOND, because 2 diamonds == an up arrow and a right arrow.

Grief, you peeps got me today, sjoe!

]]>

By: Chris M

Chris M — Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:16:35 +0000

Right, I could be wrong, but here goes..

There are two situations where diamonds are followed by arrows, in one case an upward-facing arrow and in the other case, a right-facing arrow. On the third scale, there is already a diamond followed by an up arrow, therefore by logical deducation I presume the answer is:

Right-facing diamond?

]]>